Re: [PATCH] add a stub by which a module can bind to the AFS syscall

• Next message: Wojciech Sobczak: "Re: IBM x440 problems on 2.4.20 to 2.4.20-rc1-ac3"
• Previous message: Jesse Pollard: "Re: Why DRM exists [was Re: Flame Linus to a crisp!]"
• In reply to: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: [PATCH] add a stub by which a module can bind to the AFS syscall"
• Next in thread: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: [PATCH] add a stub by which a module can bind to the AFS syscall"
• Reply: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: [PATCH] add a stub by which a module can bind to the AFS syscall"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, Apr 30, 2003 at 03:02:11PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 30, 2003 at 02:44:54PM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> >
> > Hi Linus,
> >
> > This patch makes it possible for a module to bind safely to the AFS syscall,
> > without having to modify the syscall table directly.
>
> Umm, you're adding a handler so that a module can register a variadic
> multiplexer syscall?? I think you need to rething your design..

It's better than the alternative, having OpenAFS patch the system
call table itself... ;-)

        Jeff

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Wojciech Sobczak: "Re: IBM x440 problems on 2.4.20 to 2.4.20-rc1-ac3"
• Previous message: Jesse Pollard: "Re: Why DRM exists [was Re: Flame Linus to a crisp!]"
• In reply to: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: [PATCH] add a stub by which a module can bind to the AFS syscall"
• Next in thread: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: [PATCH] add a stub by which a module can bind to the AFS syscall"
• Reply: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: [PATCH] add a stub by which a module can bind to the AFS syscall"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Apr 30 2003 - 22:00:35 EST