Re: [PATCH] add a stub by which a module can bind to the AFS syscall

• Next message: chas williams: "Re: [PATCH] add a stub by which a module can bind to the AFS syscall"
• Previous message: Falk Hueffner: "Re: [RFC][PATCH] Faster generic_fls"
• In reply to: Jeff Garzik: "Re: [PATCH] add a stub by which a module can bind to the AFS syscall"
• Next in thread: chas williams: "Re: [PATCH] add a stub by which a module can bind to the AFS syscall"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, Apr 30, 2003 at 10:46:38AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> It's better than the alternative, having OpenAFS patch the system
> call table itself... ;-)

That's already taken care of with David's first patch. There's no
reason we can't have an afsctlfs like the nfsctlfs. But anyway,
please list the prototypes and usages of the subcalls here, maybe
some of them are generally usefull.

This kind of "I need a stuff fr a random syscall multiplexer"
requests are silly. APIs need review or you'll get the syssgi syndrome
really soon..

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: chas williams: "Re: [PATCH] add a stub by which a module can bind to the AFS syscall"
• Previous message: Falk Hueffner: "Re: [RFC][PATCH] Faster generic_fls"
• In reply to: Jeff Garzik: "Re: [PATCH] add a stub by which a module can bind to the AFS syscall"
• Next in thread: chas williams: "Re: [PATCH] add a stub by which a module can bind to the AFS syscall"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Apr 30 2003 - 22:00:35 EST