Re: [PATCH] fix rq->flags use in ide-tape.c

[Jens Axboe]

On Wed, Nov 05 2003, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> On Wednesday 05 of November 2003 13:00, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > On Wednesday 05 of November 2003 09:40, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 04 2003, Linux Kernel Mailing List wrote:
> > > > ChangeSet 1.1413, 2003/11/04 08:01:30-08:00,
> > > > B.Zolnierkiewicz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > >
> > > > 	[PATCH] fix rq->flags use in ide-tape.c
> > > >
> > > > 	Noticed by Stuart_Hayes@xxxxxxxx:
> > >
> > > Guys, this is _way_ ugly. We definitely dont need more crap in ->flags
> > > for private driver use, stuff them somewhere else in the rq. rq->cmd[0]
> > > usage would be a whole lot better. This patch should never have been
> > > merged. If each and every driver needs 5 private bits in ->flags,
> > > well...
> >
> > Yeah, it is ugly.  Using rq->cmd is also ugly as it hides the problem in
> > ide-tape.c, but if you prefer this way I can clean it up.  I just wanted
> > minimal changes to ide-tape.c to make it working.
> 
> Also putting these flags in rq->cmd[0] makes it hard to later convert
> ide-tape.c to use rq->cmd[] for storing packet commands.

What's wrong with just looking at the opcode instead of inventing magic
flags. Seems like _just_ the right thing to do, convert to really using
rq and killing the private command stuff as much as possible. The latter
can wait though, the flag thing really has to go right now.

ide-*.c driver by Gadi are all completely over designed and attempts to
basically implement everything themselves. Horrible.

-- 
Jens Axboe

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/