Re: [PATCH] i2o_core.c, i2o_scsi.c minor bugfixes
From: Andrew Morton
Date: Mon Jan 19 2004 - 23:09:18 EST
Markus Lidel <Markus.Lidel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> after using the i2o modules (i2o_core and i2o_scsi), i found that there seems to be some minor problems in the 2.6.1 kernel
> version. So i have created a patch, which resolves the following issues:
>
>
> i2o-cleanup.patch:
I get 100% rejects applying this. Could you resend it as an attachment?
> --- drivers/message/i2o.old/i2o_core.c 2004-01-17 22:47:00.000000000 +0100
> +++ drivers/message/i2o/i2o_core.c 2004-01-17 23:34:43.866973586 +0100
Also, this renaming arrangement breaks my scripts (at least). Preferable
would be:
--- a/drivers/message/i2o/i2o_core.c
+++ b/drivers/message/i2o/i2o_core.c
> Also i found that the resource management in i2o_scsi is static, so i tried
> to make things a little bit dynamic by allocating the mapping tables at
> module insertion (not included in this e-mail). Because i don't saw a
> maintainer for those module, i wrote to the kernel mailing list. Can
> anybody tell me, who i can contact to verify if my changes are of any
> value? I want to contribute some more code, because on my system the
> i2o_block doesn't work too. But before, i want to be sure that my code is
> needed and also is good enough to be included into the kernel.
I think that would be Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/