Re: [PATCH] Introduce nodemask_t ADT [0/7]

From: Paul Jackson
Date: Thu Mar 18 2004 - 21:01:03 EST


> These (cpumask_t/nodemask_t) are nice because they are
> optimized for edge cases (UP for cpumask_t and Non-NUMA for nodemask_t)
> as well as for long mask cases (passing by structs reference).

When I looked at the assembly code generated on my one lung i386 box for
native gcc 3.3.2, it looked pretty good (to my untrained eye) using a
struct of an array of unsigned longs, both for the single unsigned long
(<= 32 bits) and multiple unsigned long cases.

Except for the sparc64 guys and their friends who disparage passing
structs on the stack, I conjecture that the single implementation of a
struct of an array of unsigned longs is nearly ideal for all
architectures.

... go ahead ... prove me wrong. It probably won't be hard ;).

--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <pj@xxxxxxx> 1.650.933.1373
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/