Re: CONFIG_PREEMPT and server workloads

[Eric St-Laurent]

On Thu, 2004-03-18 at 10:28, Takashi Iwai wrote:

> in my case with reiserfs, i got 0.4ms RT-latency with my test suite
> (with athlon 2200+).
> 
> there is another point to be fixed in the reiserfs journal
> transaction.  then you'll get 0.1ms RT-latency without preemption.

Are you talking about the following patch recently merged in Linus tree?

[PATCH] resierfs: scheduling latency improvements
http://linus.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.5/cset@40571b49jtE7PzOtsXjBx65-GoDijg

I'm interested to try any patch you might have to help reduce latency
with reiserfs.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/