Re: spurious 8259A interrupt
From: Russell King
Date: Fri Mar 19 2004 - 08:17:49 EST
On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 01:06:10PM +0000, Jamie Lokier wrote:
> For those rare occasions when an interrupt handler wants to re-enable
> interrupts (sti), _then_ it could mask the interrupt that called the handler.
Interrupt handlers generally run with the CPU interrupt disable flag
cleared, so other interrupts can be serviced.
--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of: 2.6 PCMCIA - http://pcmcia.arm.linux.org.uk/
2.6 Serial core
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/