Re: 2.6.7-rc1 breaks forcedeth
From: Jeff Garzik
Date: Sun Jun 06 2004 - 13:23:16 EST
Linus Torvalds wrote:
The thing is, the driver seems to not actually even register the irq
handler until the device is opened, which seems a bit bogus. It will
That's normal. The net driver model is:
Probe phase (struct pci_driver::probe):
* make sure device isn't actively sending irqs or DMA'ing
* read MAC address from EEPROM
* put device in low power state (D3 is acceptable)
Interface-up (dev->open):
* power-up device
* allocate consistent DMA memory
* request_irq
* activate DMA engine
* activate link state machine (hardware or software)
Interface-down (dev->stop):
* reverse the interface-up steps
So by definition it is a driver bug if the hardware is sending irqs
outside of when the driver indicates interest in the irq via
request_irq...free_irq.
This is very nice because the sysadmin knows the device is inactive when
the interface is down, providing a clear and clean correlation between
interface state and hardware state.
In a _very few_ situations, it is impossible to do this because the
hardware (or virtual hardware, such as ppc64 hypervisor or s/390) sends
interesting (or necessary) events while the interface is down.
certainly result in problems if the device ever sends an interrupt. And
that seems to be exactly the behaviour you see.
I suspect that the driver should at the very least make sure to disable
any potentially pending interrupts in the "nv_probe()" function. I have no
idea how to do that, but it looks like something like
writel(0, base + NvRegIrqMask);
writel(NVREG_IRQSTAT_MASK, base + NvRegIrqStatus);
Agreed; this naturally falls out of the above "Probe phase" description,
in a properly written driver.
Also, PCI 2.3 devices have an "interrupt disable" bit in PCI_COMMAND
they can use, iff (a) it's implemented and (b) the driver isn't using MSI.
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/