Re: [patch 1/1] dm: fix printk warnings about whether %lu/%Lu is right for sector_t

[BlaisorBlade]

On Friday 08 October 2004 23:57, Anton Altaparmakov wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Oct 2004, Paolo Giarrusso wrote:
> > On Friday 08 October 2004 22:11, Anton Altaparmakov wrote:
> > > On Fri, 8 Oct 2004, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > > blaisorblade_spam@xxxxxxxx wrote:

> Yes I know in the kernel and on i386 it makes no difference, I said that
> already.  But on some systems it does make a difference.  I have seen it
> myself and I have had it reported. 

> Thinking about it when I said 
> architectures I possibly meant to say "other Unix flavours", I think one
> of the *BSDs was the one where I saw the difference between %L and %ll
> manifest itself.
Ok, I thought hardware archs - for other Unixes you're right.

Sorry for this and thanks for the lesson. Bye
> Sorry, it is not.  I find it somewhat strange that you choose gcc and
> glibc to say what is correct...  Ever heard of standards?!?
Yes, I heard them, I just never bought ISO standards.

-- 
Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade
Linux registered user n. 292729
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/