Re: [patch 1/1] dm: fix printk warnings about whether %lu/%Lu isright for sector_t

[Anton Altaparmakov]

On Sat, 9 Oct 2004, BlaisorBlade wrote:
> On Friday 08 October 2004 23:57, Anton Altaparmakov wrote:
> > On Fri, 8 Oct 2004, Paolo Giarrusso wrote:
> > > On Friday 08 October 2004 22:11, Anton Altaparmakov wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 8 Oct 2004, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > > > blaisorblade_spam@xxxxxxxx wrote:
> 
> > Yes I know in the kernel and on i386 it makes no difference, I said that
> > already.  But on some systems it does make a difference.  I have seen it
> > myself and I have had it reported. 
> 
> > Thinking about it when I said 
> > architectures I possibly meant to say "other Unix flavours", I think one
> > of the *BSDs was the one where I saw the difference between %L and %ll
> > manifest itself.
> Ok, I thought hardware archs - for other Unixes you're right.
> 
> Sorry for this and thanks for the lesson. Bye
> > Sorry, it is not.  I find it somewhat strange that you choose gcc and
> > glibc to say what is correct...  Ever heard of standards?!?
> Yes, I heard them, I just never bought ISO standards.

Just search google and you will find plenty of places offering them for 
free download...

Best regards,

	Anton
-- 
Anton Altaparmakov <aia21 at cam.ac.uk> (replace at with @)
Unix Support, Computing Service, University of Cambridge, CB2 3QH, UK
Linux NTFS maintainer / IRC: #ntfs on irc.freenode.net
WWW: http://linux-ntfs.sf.net/ & http://www-stu.christs.cam.ac.uk/~aia21/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/