Re: USB making time drift [was Re: dynamic-hz]

[Andrea Arcangeli]

On Wed, Dec 15, 2004 at 11:44:38AM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
> The HZ=1000 is the culprit?

HZ=1000 isn't the culprit. The culprit is the >1msec latency of the usb
irq, but that wouldn't be visible with HZ 100 (for this specific case
HZ=100 would only be a band-aid). 

> Onboard AC-97 audio of course.  Crappy stuff... [..]

I doubt it's the chip, but only the motherboard to blame. My laptop has
the ac97 but no HZ sound out of it.

> translate to 10 millisecond intervals.  If you had a 4 millisecond 
> latency,
> that would be spread over 4 of the 1000 hz interrupts.  That sounds
> rather confusing to the service routine I imagine.

The ones that get confused are the system time and the jiffies, the rest
of the system can deal with long irq delays. The tick adjustment was
exactly implemented so that the jiffies and system time wouldn't get
confused anymore, but it just confuses it the other way around in my
current experience.

> I'll do that just for grins & report back.

Ok.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/