Re: USB making time drift [was Re: dynamic-hz]

[Gene Heskett]

On Wednesday 15 December 2004 13:20, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
>On Wed, Dec 15, 2004 at 11:44:38AM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> The HZ=1000 is the culprit?
>
>HZ=1000 isn't the culprit. The culprit is the >1msec latency of the
> usb irq, but that wouldn't be visible with HZ 100 (for this
:> specific case HZ=100 would only be a band-aid).
>
>> Onboard AC-97 audio of course.  Crappy stuff... [..]
>
>I doubt it's the chip, but only the motherboard to blame. My laptop
> has the ac97 but no HZ sound out of it.
>
>> translate to 10 millisecond intervals.  If you had a 4 millisecond
>> latency,
>> that would be spread over 4 of the 1000 hz interrupts.  That
>> sounds rather confusing to the service routine I imagine.
>
>The ones that get confused are the system time and the jiffies, the
> rest of the system can deal with long irq delays. The tick
> adjustment was exactly implemented so that the jiffies and system
> time wouldn't get confused anymore, but it just confuses it the
> other way around in my current experience.
>
>> I'll do that just for grins & report back.
>
>Ok.

Unforch, I was not able to find that in the .config file, so where is
that particular option set?

-- 
Cheers, Gene
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
99.30% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly
Yahoo.com attorneys please note, additions to this message
by Gene Heskett are:
Copyright 2004 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/