Re: x86_64: 32bit emulation problems

[Bernd Schubert]

On Wednesday 02 March 2005 10:13, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> on den 02.03.2005 Klokka 09:18 (+0100) skreiv Andi Kleen:
> > On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 12:46:23AM +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> > > Bernd Schubert <bernd-schubert@xxxxxx> writes:
> > > > Hmm, after compiling with -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 it works fine. But
> > > > why does it work without this option on a 32bit kernel, but not on a
> > > > 64bit kernel?
> > >
> > > See nfs_fileid_to_ino_t for why the inode number is different between
> > > 32bit and 64bit kernels.
> >
> > Ok that explains it. Thanks.

Many thanks also from me!

> >
> > Best would be probably to just do the shift unconditionally on 64bit
> > kernels too.
> >
> > Trond, what do you think?
>
> Why would this be more appropriate than defining __kernel_ino_t on the
> x86_64 platform to be of the size that you actually want the kernel to
> support?
>
> I can see no good reason for truncating inode number values on platforms
> that actually do support 64-bit inode numbers, but I can see several

Well, at least we would have a reason ;)

> reasons why you might want not to (utilities that need to detect hard
> linked files for instance).

Anyway, glibc already seems to have a condition for that, so IMHO glibc also 
could truncate the inode numbers if needed. And finally glibc probably knows 
best if its compiled as 32bit or 64bit. Will take a look into the glibc 
sources.

Many, many thanks to all for their help!

Best wishes,
 Bernd
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/