Re: [RFQ] Rules for accepting patches into the linux-releases tree

[Adam Sampson]

Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

>  - It must fix a problem that causes a build error (but not for things
>    marked CONFIG_BROKEN), an oops, a hang, or a real security issue.

So a trivial patch that fixed a data corruption issue wouldn't be
accepted?

-- 
Adam Sampson <azz@xxxxxxxxxx>                        <http://offog.org/>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/