Re: [RFQ] Rules for accepting patches into the linux-releases tree

[Greg KH]

On Sat, Mar 05, 2005 at 09:58:00AM +0000, Adam Sampson wrote:
> Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> >  - It must fix a problem that causes a build error (but not for things
> >    marked CONFIG_BROKEN), an oops, a hang, or a real security issue.
> 
> So a trivial patch that fixed a data corruption issue wouldn't be
> accepted?

Good point, I've now added that.

thanks,

greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/