Re: [PATCH 1/2] BDI: Provide backing device capability information

From: Andrew Morton
Date: Mon Mar 07 2005 - 06:39:20 EST


David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > > Making these into bitfields would result in having to use three variables
> > > instead of just the one.
> >
> > Well let's do one or the other, and not have it half-and-half, please.
>
> So I should fold the two other bitfields back into the capabilities mask and
> make it an unsigned long.

I suppose so. Although unsigned int would be preferable.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/