Re: [PATCH 1/2] BDI: Provide backing device capability information

[David Howells]

Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

> >  So I should fold the two other bitfields back into the capabilities mask
> >  and make it an unsigned long.
> 
> I suppose so.  Although unsigned int would be preferable.

Any particular reason? It's mixed in with other unsigned longs and pointers
after all...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/