Re: [patch 1/1] unified spinlock initializationarch/um/drivers/port_kern.c

[Andrew Morton]

Russell King <rmk+lkml@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>  I'm not convinced about the practicality of converting all static
>  initialisations to code-based initialisations though

This is the first one I recall seeing.  All the other conversions were replacing

	static spinlock_t lock = SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED;

with
	static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(lock);

and replacing

	{
		lock = SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED;
	}

with

	{
		spin_lock_init(lock);
	}

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/