Re: 2.6.12-rc2-mm1

[Arjan van de Ven]

On Tue, 2005-04-05 at 19:20 +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> Dave Airlie writes:
> 
> > Paulus these look like your patches care to update them with the "new"
> > method of doing stuff..
> 
> What are we going to do about the DRM CVS?  Change it to the new way
> and break everyone running 2.6.10 or earlier, or leave it at the old
> way that will work for people with distro kernels, and have a
> divergence between it and what's in the kernel?

(some distros like Fedora Core have modern kernels even for older
releases)


> Also, the compat_ioctl method is called without the BKL held, unlike
> the ioctl method.  What impact will that have?  Do we need to take the
> BKL in the compat_ioctl method?

How much does DRM actually depend on the BKL? I would hope not too
much...

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/