Re: [patch 2/5] sched: NULL domains

[Nick Piggin]

Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> > * Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >
> > > 2/5
> >
> > > The previous patch fixed the last 2 places that directly access a
> > > runqueue's sched-domain and assume it cannot be NULL.
> > >
> > > We can now use a NULL domain instead of a dummy domain to signify
> > > no balancing is to happen. No functional changes.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
  ^^^

Thanks.

> if the previous 'remove degenerate domains' patch would go away then 
> this patch needs to be merged/modified. (and most of the others as well)

I probably should respin this so it goes in *first* anyway.
Rather than doing half in the remove degenerate domains and
half here.

--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/