Re: [patch 3/5] sched: multilevel sbe and sbf
From: Nick Piggin
Date: Wed Apr 06 2005 - 02:59:05 EST
Ingo Molnar wrote:
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
note that no matter how much scheduler logic, in the end
cross-scheduling of tasks between nodes on NUMA will always have a
permanent penalty (i.e. the 'migration cost' is 'infinity' in the long
run), so the primary focus _hast to be_ on 'get it right initially' When
tasks must spill over to other nodes will always remain a special case.
So balance-on-fork/exec/[clone] definitely needs to be aware of the full
domain tree picture.
Yes, well put. I imagine this will only become more important as
there becomes more push towards multiprocessing machines, and the
need for higher memory bandwidth and lower latency to CPUs.
--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/