Re: [PATCH 2.6.12-rc2] aoe [1/6]: improve allowed interfaces configuration

[Ed L Cashin]

"Bodo Eggert <harvested.in.lkml@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>" <7eggert@xxxxxx> writes:

> Ed L Cashin <ecashin@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> +++ b/Documentation/aoe/aoe.txt       2005-04-20 11:42:20.000000000 -0400
>
>> +  When the aoe driver is a module, use
>
> Is there any reason for this inconsistent behaviour?

Yes, the /sys/module/aoe area is only present when the aoe driver is a
module.  It would be nicer if there were a sysfs area where I could
put this file regardless of whether the driver is a module or built
into the kernel.  

I could probably create one, but I got the file in
/sys/module/aoe/parameters for free when I used module_param_string.

>> +  /sys/module/aoe/parameters/aoe_iflist instead of
>                                 ^^^
>
> Why does the module name need to be part of the attribute?
> That's redundant. That's redundant.

Yes.  That's true.  Redundancy isn't always bad, though, and using the
"aoe_" prefix lets the kernel parameter for the built-in aoe driver be
the same as the parameter for the modular driver.

-- 
  Ed L Cashin <ecashin@xxxxxxxxxx>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/