Re: [patch 1/7] uml: fix syscall table by including $(SUBARCH)'s one, for i386

[Blaisorblade]

On Tuesday 26 April 2005 13:33, Andrew Morton wrote:
> blaisorblade@xxxxxxxx wrote:
> >  linux-2.6.12-paolo/arch/i386/kernel/entry.S                 |  292
> > ------------ linux-2.6.12-paolo/arch/i386/kernel/syscall_table.S        
> > |  291 +++++++++++
>
> gack.  Any time anyone touches the syscall tables I have to delicately
> rework 8,000 perfctr patches.
>
> So I folded all the perfctr patches into a single patch for now.  Later
> I'll split it out into core and architectures.
Possibly splitting away the "syscall table change" for i386 (which is the only 
one being impacted) and having the two versions (pre- and post- the other 
patches) would help...
-- 
Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade
Skype user "PaoloGiarrusso"
Linux registered user n. 292729
http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/