Re: [PATCH] local_irq_disable removal

[Daniel Walker]

On Sun, 12 Jun 2005, Karim Yaghmour wrote:
 
 
> This is why I have a hard time understanding the statement that
> "It would be Linux and Adeos, but never just Linux." In this case,
> it would be Linux with an ipipe. Said ipipe can then be left
> unpopulated, and then we get back to what you guys have just
> implemented. Or a driver can use it to obtain hard-rt. Or
> additional Adeos components can hook onto the ipipe to provide
> services enabling RTAI to run side-by-side with Linux.

My reasoning is that Linux doesn't run in ring 0 . That to me makes linux 
and ADEOS two different entities. That's my way of looking at it. 

> May I suggest getting a copy of a recent Adeos patch and looking
> through it? I'm sure it would make things much simpler to
> understand.

I haven't looked at the code, I would like to . I have read about 
the ADEOS implementation .

Daniel

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/