Re: [ckrm-tech] Re: [patch 02/38] CKRM e18: Processor Delay Accounting

[Ingo Molnar]

* Shailabh Nagar <nagar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Thanks. task_curr is what we needed. Would exporting task_curr be ok 
> or should we continue to wrap in a separate function ?

wrapping a non-exported function and then exporting it is not nice at 
all (it circumvents the non-exported status of that original function).  
But we can internal-export (EXPORT_GPL) task_curr() itself.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/