Re: [ckrm-tech] Re: [patch 02/38] CKRM e18: Processor Delay Accounting

[Gerrit Huizenga]

On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 09:20:19 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Shailabh Nagar <nagar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > Thanks. task_curr is what we needed. Would exporting task_curr be ok 
> > or should we continue to wrap in a separate function ?
> 
> wrapping a non-exported function and then exporting it is not nice at 
> all (it circumvents the non-exported status of that original function).  
> But we can internal-export (EXPORT_GPL) task_curr() itself.
> 
> 	Ingo

That would work for us - this is a GPL'd module directed towards
mainline.  No licensing issues to worry about.

gerrit
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/