Re: 2.6.12-mm1 boot failure on NUMA box.

From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Fri Jun 24 2005 - 14:58:53 EST



* Martin J. Bligh <mbligh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > - /*
> > - * In the NUMA case we dont use the TSC as they are not
> > - * synchronized across all CPUs.
> > - */
> > -#ifndef CONFIG_NUMA
> > - if (!use_tsc)
> > -#endif
> > + if (!cpu_has_tsc)
> > /* no locking but a rare wrong value is not a big deal */
> > return jiffies_64 * (1000000000 / HZ);
>
> Humpf. That does look dangerous on a NUMA-Q. The TSCs aren't synced,
> and we can't use them .... have to use PIT, whether the CPUs have TSC
> or not.

is the only problem the unsyncedness? That should be fine as far as the
scheduler is concerned. (we compensate for per-CPU drifts)

Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/