Re: recent kprobe work

[Rusty Lynch]

On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 02:01:36PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
> 
> Can the folks submitting all of the kprobe stuff at least consult me
> when they can't figure out how to implement the sparc64 kprobe variant
> for new features?
> 
> Currently, the sparc64 build is broken by recent kprobe
> changes:
> 
> kernel/built-in.o: In function `init_kprobes':
> : undefined reference to `arch_init'
> 
> Also, can we use a more namespace friendly name for this kprobe layer
> specific function other than "arch_init()"?
> 
> Thanks.

Sorry, just an oversight.  We have several arch_* functions, maybe we should
start using kprobes_arch_* instead.

    --rusty
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/