Re: [PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt

[Lee Revell]

On Wed, 2005-07-13 at 11:59 -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> > The real answer here is for the tickless patches to cleaned up to the
> > point where they can be merged, and then we won't waste battery power
> > entering the timer interrupt in the first place.  :-)
> 
> And that does seem to be the long term solution. Most (not all) modern 
> hardware has a readable timer as accurate as the tick, so doing a timer 
> to clock conversion as needed would be possible.
> 
> Unfortunately the interest in tickless operation seems to be mostly in 
> the power saving possibilities of laptops. If you could make it part of 
> some really sexy high interest area, like real time premption, it might 
> get done sooner ;-)
> 

Actually, there is quite a bit of interest already in the same circles
that are using RT preempt.  "How do I get a timer with better than 1ms
resolution" is an FAQ on linux-audio-dev, and once you have dynamic tick
the next logical step is high res timers.

Currently we refer these users to George's site.  I suspect the only
reason there has not been more interest is that not many users are up to
integrating the HRT and the RT preempt patch.

Lee

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/