Re: [PATCH] rename locking functions - fix a blunder in initial patches

[Nathan Scott]

On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 11:09:33PM +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> ...
> have if getting rid of the defines is prefered, then that's something that
> can easily be done later.

I tend to agree with Christoph on this - this level of internal API
churn is unnecessary and can be error prone (as you cunningly showed ;)
- please just leave it as is, and move on to greener pastures.

thanks.

-- 
Nathan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/