Re: [PATCH] rename locking functions - fix a blunder in initial patches

[Jesper Juhl]

On 8/19/05, Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 11:09:33PM +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> > ...
> > have if getting rid of the defines is prefered, then that's something that
> > can easily be done later.
> 
> I tend to agree with Christoph on this - this level of internal API
> churn is unnecessary and can be error prone (as you cunningly showed ;)
> - please just leave it as is, and move on to greener pastures.
> 

If that's the general oppinion, then sure, I'll leave it alone. Just
thought it would be nice to make things more consistently named.

I'll leave it in the capable hands of akpm and not press the issue any further.

-- 
Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@xxxxxxxxx>
Don't top-post  http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
Plain text mails only, please      http://www.expita.com/nomime.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/