Re: [RFC - 0/9] Generic timekeeping subsystem (v. B5)

[Roman Zippel]

Hi,

On Wed, 24 Aug 2005, john stultz wrote:

> from your example:
> >		// at init: system_update = update_cycles * mult;
> > 		system_time += system_update;
> 
> and:
> > 	error = system_time - (xtime.tv_nsec << shift);
> 
> This doesn't seem to make sense with the above.  Could you clarify?

The example here doesn't keep the complete system time, just enough to 
compute the difference.

bye, Roman
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/