Re: [patch 2.6.13] swiotlb: add swiotlb_sync_single_range_for_{cpu,device}

[John W. Linville]

On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 11:03:35AM -0700, Luck, Tony wrote:
> 
> >+swiotlb_sync_single_range_for_cpu(struct device *hwdev, 
> >+swiotlb_sync_single_range_for_device(struct device *hwdev, 
> 
> Huh?  These look identical ... same args, same code, just a
> different name.

Have you looked at the implementations for swiotlb_sync_single_for_cpu
and swiotlb_sync_single_for_device?  Those are already identical.

I'm just following the existing style/practice in that file.  I could
do an additional patch to rectify the replication in those functions
if you'd like?

Who is responsible for the swiotlb code?

John
-- 
John W. Linville
linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/