[rfc patch] swiotlb: consolidate swiotlb_sync_single_* implementations
From: John W. Linville
Date: Tue Aug 30 2005 - 13:35:06 EST
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 02:09:14PM -0400, John W. Linville wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 11:03:35AM -0700, Luck, Tony wrote:
> >
> > >+swiotlb_sync_single_range_for_cpu(struct device *hwdev,
> > >+swiotlb_sync_single_range_for_device(struct device *hwdev,
> >
> > Huh? These look identical ... same args, same code, just a
> > different name.
>
> Have you looked at the implementations for swiotlb_sync_single_for_cpu
> and swiotlb_sync_single_for_device? Those are already identical.
How about a patch like this? Just for comment...I'll repost if people
want it...
John
P.S. This is meant to apply on top of my previous swiotlb patch...
--- linux-8_29_2005/arch/ia64/lib/swiotlb.c.orig 2005-08-30 14:19:32.000000000 -0400
+++ linux-8_29_2005/arch/ia64/lib/swiotlb.c 2005-08-30 14:23:18.000000000 -0400
@@ -493,11 +493,11 @@ swiotlb_unmap_single(struct device *hwde
* address back to the card, you must first perform a
* swiotlb_dma_sync_for_device, and then the device again owns the buffer
*/
-void
-swiotlb_sync_single_for_cpu(struct device *hwdev, dma_addr_t dev_addr,
- size_t size, int dir)
+static inline void
+swiotlb_sync_single_range(struct device *hwdev, dma_addr_t dev_addr,
+ unsigned long offset, size_t size, int dir)
{
- char *dma_addr = phys_to_virt(dev_addr);
+ char *dma_addr = phys_to_virt(dev_addr) + offset;
if (dir == DMA_NONE)
BUG();
@@ -508,17 +508,17 @@ swiotlb_sync_single_for_cpu(struct devic
}
void
+swiotlb_sync_single_for_cpu(struct device *hwdev, dma_addr_t dev_addr,
+ size_t size, int dir)
+{
+ swiotlb_sync_single_range(hwdev, dev_addr, 0, size, dir);
+}
+
+void
swiotlb_sync_single_for_device(struct device *hwdev, dma_addr_t dev_addr,
size_t size, int dir)
{
- char *dma_addr = phys_to_virt(dev_addr);
-
- if (dir == DMA_NONE)
- BUG();
- if (dma_addr >= io_tlb_start && dma_addr < io_tlb_end)
- sync_single(hwdev, dma_addr, size, dir);
- else if (dir == DMA_FROM_DEVICE)
- mark_clean(dma_addr, size);
+ swiotlb_sync_single_range(hwdev, dev_addr, 0, size, dir);
}
/*
@@ -528,28 +528,14 @@ void
swiotlb_sync_single_range_for_cpu(struct device *hwdev, dma_addr_t dev_addr,
unsigned long offset, size_t size, int dir)
{
- char *dma_addr = phys_to_virt(dev_addr) + offset;
-
- if (dir == DMA_NONE)
- BUG();
- if (dma_addr >= io_tlb_start && dma_addr < io_tlb_end)
- sync_single(hwdev, dma_addr, size, dir);
- else if (dir == DMA_FROM_DEVICE)
- mark_clean(dma_addr, size);
+ swiotlb_sync_single_range(hwdev, dev_addr, offset, size, dir);
}
void
swiotlb_sync_single_range_for_device(struct device *hwdev, dma_addr_t dev_addr,
unsigned long offset, size_t size, int dir)
{
- char *dma_addr = phys_to_virt(dev_addr) + offset;
-
- if (dir == DMA_NONE)
- BUG();
- if (dma_addr >= io_tlb_start && dma_addr < io_tlb_end)
- sync_single(hwdev, dma_addr, size, dir);
- else if (dir == DMA_FROM_DEVICE)
- mark_clean(dma_addr, size);
+ swiotlb_sync_single_range(hwdev, dev_addr, offset, size, dir);
}
/*
--
John W. Linville
linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/