Re: State of Linux graphics

[Jon Smirl]

On 9/1/05, Jim Gettys <jg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Not at all.
> 
> We're pursuing two courses of action right now, that are not mutually
> exclusive.
> 
> Jon Smirl's argument is that we can satisfy both needs simultaneously
> with a GL only strategy, and that doing two is counter productive,
> primarily on available resource grounds.
> 
> My point is that I don't think the case has (yet) been made to put all
> eggs into that one basket, and that some of the arguments presented for
> that course of action don't hold together.

We're not putting all of our eggs in one basket, you keep forgetting
that we already have a server that supports all of the currently
existing hardware. The question is where do we want to put our future
eggs.

-- 
Jon Smirl
jonsmirl@xxxxxxxxx
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/