Re: [PATCH 1/2] miss-sync changes on attributes (Re: [PATCH 2/2][FAT]miss-sync issues on sync mount (miss-sync on utime))

[Machida, Hiroyuki]

OGAWA Hirofumi wrote:
> Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>
> > However there's not much point in writing a brand-new function when
> > write_inode_now() almost does the right thing.  We can share the
> > implementation within fs-writeback.c.
>
>
> Indeed. We use the generic_osync_inode() for it?

Please let me confirm.
Using generic_osync_inode(inode, NULL, OSYNC_INODE) instaed of
sync_inode_wodata(inode) is peferable for changes on fs/open.c,
even it would write data. Is it correct?


--
Hiroyuki Machida		machida@xxxxxxxxxxxxx		

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/