Re: [PATCH] i386, nmi: signed vs unsigned mixup
From: Andrew Morton
Date: Sat Nov 19 2005 - 20:34:04 EST
Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Ok, so does that mean that, if properly verified, patches for things
> that "gcc -Wsigned-compare" flags will be appreciated?
All patches are appreciated, but not all are applied ;)
Sure, go for it - let's see what the patches end up looking like. We might
find real bugs in there - I found a bunch of howlers back in 2.3.late.
That was with `gcc -W' which turns on more than -Wsigned-compare.
Maybe you could prepare a quick overall summary first, see if you can work
out the overall scope of the problem and then we can take a look at that,
decide what bits to attack?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/