Re: [PATCH] i386, nmi: signed vs unsigned mixup

[Andrew Morton]

Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Ok, so does that mean that, if properly verified, patches for things
>  that "gcc -Wsigned-compare" flags will be appreciated?

All patches are appreciated, but not all are applied ;)

Sure, go for it - let's see what the patches end up looking like.  We might
find real bugs in there - I found a bunch of howlers back in 2.3.late. 
That was with `gcc -W' which turns on more than -Wsigned-compare.

Maybe you could prepare a quick overall summary first, see if you can work
out the overall scope of the problem and then we can take a look at that,
decide what bits to attack?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/