Re: CIFS improvements/wider testing needed

From: Steve French
Date: Mon Nov 21 2005 - 16:30:31 EST


Steve French wrote:


Well I would be surprised the "cat >> titi" command does any of this
byte range lock. If the "create and later rewrite the same file"
sequence fails, with a simple cat command (cat > titi ... ^D; cat >>
titi), how can it works with complicated applications?

Make sure that you let me know if your cat example works when mounted with the relatively new "noperm" mount option on the client. At least then we will know whether we are looking at a problem with access control on the server (ntfs acls) or client (unix mode bits and the .permission entry point)
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at