Re: [linux-pm] [RFC] userland swsusp

[Pavel Machek]

On St 23-11-05 11:16:27, Lorenzo Colitti wrote:
> Pavel Machek wrote:
> >Yes, hopefully users will not notice.
> 
> ? So the idea is to merge inferior code and "hope users won't notice"?
> 
> Users  might not notice that half their memory is gone, but they *will* 
> notice that their system is dog slow when it resumes because all their 
> caches are gone and a most of their stuff is swapped out.
> 
> Non-responsive system on resume is one of the main reasons that swsusp2 
> is much better than swsusp1, and yes, users *do* notice (I was one of 
> them, as I pointed out a while back). Yes, 50% is better than nothing, 
> but it's still a pretty poor show.

Did you actually benchmark it?

> Seen from the perspective of a user, the situation is simple: suspend2 
> works, it's fast, and it's rock-solid. Just use it.

About as helpful as "Windows XP works, it's fast, and it's
rock-solid".

							Pavel
-- 
Thanks, Sharp!
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/