Re: [linux-pm] [RFC] userland swsusp
From: Lorenzo Colitti
Date: Wed Nov 23 2005 - 05:16:38 EST
Pavel Machek wrote:
Yes, hopefully users will not notice.
? So the idea is to merge inferior code and "hope users won't notice"?
Users might not notice that half their memory is gone, but they *will*
notice that their system is dog slow when it resumes because all their
caches are gone and a most of their stuff is swapped out.
Non-responsive system on resume is one of the main reasons that swsusp2
is much better than swsusp1, and yes, users *do* notice (I was one of
them, as I pointed out a while back). Yes, 50% is better than nothing,
but it's still a pretty poor show.
Seen from the perspective of a user, the situation is simple: suspend2
works, it's fast, and it's rock-solid. Just use it.
Regards,
Lorenzo
P.S. Don't "show me the code" me. I can't write the code. :-) But based
on what I see of how well suspend2 works, I think Nigel can...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/