Re: [PATCH] split sharpsl_pm.c into generic and corgi/spitz specific parts
From: Pavel Machek
Date: Wed Nov 23 2005 - 14:51:32 EST
> > I'd like to see it applied...
> This diff looks much neater than the last one and I agree with the
> principle of it. I don't think its the right time to apply it for two
> 1. We probably shouldn't (can't?) make changes like this in -rc
No, it does not really belong in -rc. I was hoping you would merge it
in your tree so I do not have big patch here and could keep only
> I have a proposal for how we proceed with this:
> After 2.6.15 is released, I envisage a patch which splits the common
> sections of sharpsl_pm.c into arm/common and arm/mach-pxa/sharpsl.h into
> include/arm/hardware/sharpsl_pm.h. I'm happy to generate that patch if
> necessary and pass it to Russell. I'll try and create a patch to show
> the structure I'm aiming for in the next couple of days but at the
> moment we don't know exactly which code is common and I'd prefer to try
> and do the split in one go.
Ok, works for me. So I'll now concentrate on getting collie working
and leave infrastructure to you...
> I did note your patch adds a copyright header to a file you're mostly
> deleting code from?
I actually did add some collie parts into it, and then deleted
everything #ifdef collie from that. Sorry.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/