Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation
From: David Howells
Date: Thu Dec 15 2005 - 12:17:03 EST
Paul Jackson <pj@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Hint: we have DECLARE_MUTEX exactly because it's also DOCUMENTATION that
> > we use a semaphore as a pure binary mutex. Not because we need it.
>
> That's insane ...
And abused/misused...
> This is stealth documentation at its finest. Who besides Linus even
> knew that's what this spelling of the DECLARE macro was telling us?
>
> Paul "Hand me that chain saw, Billy Jo. This limb is coming -down-" Jackson
I hope you're talking about trees...
David
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/