Re: 2.6.14.5 to 2.6.15 patch

[Greg KH]

On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 10:36:10PM +0000, Nick Warne wrote:
> On Wednesday 04 January 2006 22:30, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> 
> > > (according to kernel.org).  Yet there is no upgrade path for that build
> > > (or any other .x releases)
> > >
> > > It is a bit of a mess really.
> >
> > but, a 2.6.14.6 kernel might come out *after* 2.6.15, then what?
> 
> Nightmares...

It's already happened, we did a 2.6.13.y release after 2.6.14 was out,
and I'm about to do a 2.6.14.y release in a few days too :)

> I get all the points.  Let me say then it needs better distinction on
> what the 'latest kernel' is and on what the 'latest -stable' is.

Ok, exactly how would you like this to be shown?

Again, 2.6.15 is the latest stable kernel right now.  Just because there
isn't a .1 release yet, doesn't mean it isn't.

thanks,

greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/