Re: 2.6.16-rt1

[K.R. Foley]

Daniel Walker wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-03-22 at 10:10 -0600, K.R. Foley wrote:
> 
>> Found something interesting. Having Wakeup latency timing turned on
>> makes a HUGE difference. I turned it off and recompiled and now I am
>> seeing numbers back in line with what I expected from 2.6.16-rt4. Sorry,
>> but I had no idea it would make that much difference. I don't have a
>> complete run yet, but I have seen enough to know that I am not seeing
>> tons of missed interrupts and the highest reported latency thus far is
>> 61 usec.
> 
> Just Wakeup latency timing , and not latency tracing ?
> 
> Daniel
> 
> 

Unfortunately I can't say for sure because I don't remember turning it
off, but looking at the log it appears as though latency tracing was
turned on

-- 
   kr
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/