Re: [PATCH] swsusp: separate swap-writing/reading code

[Mark Lord]

Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> I agree it probably may be improved.  Still it seems to be good enough.  Further,
> it's more efficient than the previous solution, so I consider it as an improvement.
> Also this code has been tested for quite some time in -mm and appears to
> behave properly, at least we haven't got any bug reports related to it so far.

I find the in-kernel swsusp to be quite slow, and it seems to use
an awful lot of memory for book-keeping.  So count that as encouragement
to improve the performance when you can.

> Currently I'm not working on any better solution.  If you can provide any
> patches to implement one, please submit them, but I think they'll have to be
> tested for as long as this code, in -mm.

It would be *really nice* if you guys could stop being so underhandedly
nasty in every single reply to anything from Nigel.

He really is trying to help, you know.

Cheers
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/