Re: Two comments on the H.323 conntrack/NAT helper
From: Jing Min Zhao
Date: Thu Mar 23 2006 - 21:38:04 EST
----- Original Message -----
From: "Patrick McHardy" <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>
To: "Adrian Bunk" <bunk@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <zhaojingmin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
<netfilter-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; "Jing Min Zhao"
<zhaojignmin@xxxxxxxxxxx>; <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2006 9:02 PM
Subject: Re: Two comments on the H.323 conntrack/NAT helper
[The hotmail address of the author doesn't work, CCed sourceforge-address]
Adrian Bunk wrote:
Two comments on the H.323 conntrack/NAT helper:
- the function prototypes in ip_nat_helper_h323.c are _ugly_,
please move them to a header file
Their ugliness is because of the current API, which cleaned up
quite a lot of the surrounding code, but requires this ugliness
from each helper. I would like to keep them visible as a reminder
that a cleaner solution is wanted, but moving them to header
files certainly sound like a good idea to eliminate the risk
of prototype conflicts. But please do this for all helpers
at once.
- is there a reason for not using EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL?
I would prefer that too.
Sure, I'll do that.
Thanks
Jing Min Zhao
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/