Re: [PATCH] elo: Support non-pressure-sensitive ELO touchscreens

[Dmitry Torokhov]

On 3/15/06, Shaun Jackman <sjackman@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Comments, please?
>

Hi Shaun,

Sorry it took me long time to respond... Overall it looks good, I have
couple of comments though.

> >
> > * Use the touch status bit rather than the pressure bits to
> >   distinguish a BTN_TOUCH event. Non-pressure-sensitive touchscreens
> >   always report full pressure.
> > * Report ABS_PRESSURE information only if the touchscreen supports it.

We should not only omit reporting pressure if toucscreen does not
support it but also not set ABS_PRESSURE bit in input device.

> > * Implement the checksum calculation correctly, and verify that the
> >   transmitted checksum is correct.
> > * Use dev_dbg to log errors in the protocol.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Shaun Jackman <sjackman@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/input/touchscreen/elo.c b/drivers/input/touchscreen/elo.c
> > index c86a2eb..23b269a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/input/touchscreen/elo.c
> > +++ b/drivers/input/touchscreen/elo.c
> > @@ -35,6 +35,8 @@ MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> >   */
> >
> >  #define        ELO_MAX_LENGTH  10
> > +#define ELO10_TOUCH 0x03
> > +#define ELO10_PRESSURE 0x80
> >
> >  /*
> >   * Per-touchscreen data.
> > @@ -53,38 +55,40 @@ struct elo {
> >   static void elo_process_data_10(struct elo* elo, unsigned char data,
> > struct pt_regs *regs)
> >  {
> >         struct input_dev *dev = elo->dev;
> > +       struct device *dbg = &elo->serio->dev;
> >
> > -       elo->csum += elo->data[elo->idx] = data;
> > -
> > +       elo->data[elo->idx] = data;
> >         switch (elo->idx++) {
> > -
> >                 case 0:
> > +                       elo->csum = 0xaa;
> >                         if (data != 'U') {
> > +                               dev_dbg(dbg, "unsynchronized data: 0x%02x\n", data);
> >                                 elo->idx = 0;
> > -                               elo->csum = 0;
> >                         }
> >                         break;
> > -
> > -               case 1:
> > -                       if (data != 'T') {
> > -                               elo->idx = 0;
> > -                               elo->csum = 0;
> > -                       }
> > -                       break;
> > -
> >                 case 9:
> > -                       if (elo->csum) {
> > -                               input_regs(dev, regs);
> > -                               input_report_abs(dev, ABS_X, (elo->data[4] << 8) | elo->data[3]);
> > -                               input_report_abs(dev, ABS_Y, (elo->data[6] << 8) | elo->data[5]);
> > -                               input_report_abs(dev, ABS_PRESSURE, (elo->data[8] << 8) | elo->data[7]);
> > -                               input_report_key(dev, BTN_TOUCH, elo->data[8] || elo->data[7]);
> > -                               input_sync(dev);
> > -                       }
> >                         elo->idx = 0;
> > -                       elo->csum = 0;
> > +                       if (elo->csum != elo->data[9]) {
> > +                               dev_dbg(dbg, "bad checksum: 0x%02x, expected 0x%02x\n",
> > +                                               elo->data[9], elo->csum);
> > +                               break;
> > +                       }
> > +                       if (elo->data[1] != 'T') {
> > +                               dev_dbg(dbg, "unexpected packet: 0x%02x\n",
> > +                                               elo->data[1]);
> > +                               break;
> > +                       }

What is the reason for postponing checking for 'T' until full packet
is assembled? Did you actually see packets with valid checksum but
without 'T'?

> > +                       input_regs(dev, regs);
> > +                       input_report_abs(dev, ABS_X, (elo->data[4] << 8) | elo->data[3]);
> > +                       input_report_abs(dev, ABS_Y, (elo->data[6] << 8) | elo->data[5]);
> > +                       if (elo->data[2] & ELO10_PRESSURE)
> > +                               input_report_abs(dev, ABS_PRESSURE,
> > +                                               (elo->data[8] << 8) | elo->data[7]);
> > +                       input_report_key(dev, BTN_TOUCH, elo->data[2] & ELO10_TOUCH);
> > +                       input_sync(dev);
> >                         break;
> >         }
> > +       elo->csum += data;
> >  }
> >
> >   static void elo_process_data_6(struct elo* elo, unsigned char data,
> > struct pt_regs *regs)
> > @@ -189,6 +193,7 @@ static void elo_disconnect(struct serio
> >  {
> >         struct elo* elo = serio_get_drvdata(serio);
> >
> > +       dev_dbg(&serio->dev, "disconnect\n");

I am not sure if we want to have this logging here. Serio core or
maybe even driver core might be better suited for this.

> >         input_unregister_device(elo->dev);
> >         serio_close(serio);
> >         serio_set_drvdata(serio, NULL);
> > @@ -207,6 +212,7 @@ static int elo_connect(struct serio *ser
> >         struct input_dev *input_dev;
> >         int err;
> >
> > +       dev_dbg(&serio->dev, "connect\n");

Same here.

> >         elo = kzalloc(sizeof(struct elo), GFP_KERNEL);
> >         input_dev = input_allocate_device();
> >         if (!elo || !input_dev) {
> >
>

--
Dmitry
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/