Re: [PATCH] unnecessary long index i in sched

[Jan Engelhardt]

>
>Unless we expect to have more than 4294967295 CPUs, there's no reason to
>have 'i' as a long long here.
>
If declaring it as int, your number should read as 2147483647. :)


Jan Engelhardt
-- 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/