--- Chase Venters <chase.venters@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Monday 23 October 2006 00:40, Giridhar Pemmasani wrote:
It seems that the kernel module loader taints ndiswrapper module asIndeed. 'ndiswrapper' is intentionally tainted by kernel/module.c because
proprietary, but it is not - it is fully GPL: see
http://directory.fsf.org/sysadmin/hookup/ndiswrapper.html
it is used to load and run unknown binary / proprietary code in kernel-space.
If this unknown binary / proprietary code were to contain a bug (which all
code of that complexity tends to), it might write to memory it doesn't own, or coerce a device to do so on its behalf, making a kernel crash dump analysis
into a wild goose chase (hence the reason for kernel taint).
Yes, I agree on the purpose of tainting the kernel.
Note that when a driver is loaded, ndiswrapper does taint the kernel (tobe
more accurate, it should check if the driver being loaded is GPL or not,Are you saying ndiswrapper voluntarily calls add_taint() whenever it loads
but that is not done).
an NDIS driver?
Exactly - the loader within ndiswrapper taints kernel versions 2.6.10 and
newer (older kernels don't have a way of tainting the kernel). The code is in
loader.c in ndiswrapper.
Are there even any examples of GPL-licensed NDIS drivers?
I don't remember off hand, but sometime back there was discussion on related
topic of weather ndiswrapper should be in debian-main or not, and someone
pointed out a GPL ndis driver. (BTW, after much discussion on debian devel
list, the developers agreed that ndiswrapper belongs in debian-main.)
Giri
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com -
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/