Re: incorrect taint of ndiswrapper

[Giridhar Pemmasani]

--- Chase Venters <chase.venters@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Next question - what version of ndiswrapper started voluntary tainting (or
> has 
> it always?)
> 
> That is to say, are there versions of ndiswrapper floating around out there
> in 
> the ether capable of building against 2.6.19-rc* that don't voluntarily 
> add_taint()? (I'm guessing the answer is 'no', but the answer is possibly 
> important to consider)

Since version 1.0, ndiswrapper has been tainting kernel when a driver is
loaded. Version 1.0 is quite old (circa Jan 2005) and won't build with any
recent kernels.


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/